|
Post by Scottphoto on May 14, 2017 18:53:54 GMT
A thread to discuss all the latest happening with Mass Effect Andromeda: - Share your experience playing it - Any news on DLC or Patches - Any questions or help getting through a mission - Pros and Cons Discussions PS: It's okay to say if you like or dislike the game. In general anything you want to discuss about the game and if news articles pop up about it, a place to discuss them together as well! Latest Articles: Tie In Comic Book Story to Andromeda
Bioware Montreal Scaled DownHandy Help: Remnant Puzzles Decryption
|
|
|
Post by VFerreira93 on May 14, 2017 19:28:38 GMT
Maybe a DLC hint? Not sure, but it's something.
|
|
|
Post by Scottphoto on May 14, 2017 19:51:05 GMT
Maybe a DLC hint? Not sure, but it's something. I hope there was already enough works for at least one dlc to send off the game.
|
|
|
Post by VFerreira93 on May 14, 2017 19:56:37 GMT
Maybe a DLC hint? Not sure, but it's something. I hope there was already enough works for at least one dlc to send off the game. The Quarian Ark one will most likely make it first, but I'm not so sure about that. Hopefully we'll see something around Annihilation's publication date
|
|
|
Post by Scottphoto on May 14, 2017 23:11:42 GMT
Perhaps they are waiting to see also if sales get steady and move with better legs and the multiplayer gets more micro sales going with the patches. I have seen a few articles praising the patches for the overall better polish, so we'll see. I think things will mostly be settled down with the next patch, and after that we will know if there is more to come. Hopefully the patch does deliver, they have deliver better animations overall which I thought was impossible at this point to fix, so here's hoping the m/m improvements is worthy too.
|
|
|
Post by VFerreira93 on May 15, 2017 11:33:36 GMT
Another hint? Ugh, I just wished they could say something about it
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2017 2:14:17 GMT
Current mood: I don't think these things are true but the rumors alone...
|
|
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 16, 2017 2:18:32 GMT
Maybe a DLC hint? Not sure, but it's something. On a related note, I'll be peeved if, even in DLC, Cora gets more content than anyone else. IMO, the characters with the most content should have less DLC content than the other characters because they already got so much in the main game.
|
|
|
Post by Scottphoto on May 16, 2017 2:21:14 GMT
Current mood: I don't think these things are true but the rumors alone... Hahaha Yeah. That's how I feel in general with games right now, "guess I won't play anymore" lol. I hope E3 has some game I can look forward to. Cuz literally every game franchise I like is on hold indefinitely.
|
|
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 16, 2017 2:25:21 GMT
Current mood: I don't think these things are true but the rumors alone... Hahaha Yeah. That's how I feel in general with games right now, "guess I won't play anymore" lol. I hope E3 has some game I can look forward to. Cuz literally every game franchise I like is on hold indefinitely. There's a good chance that Bethesda will reveal the new Starfield IP. While Bethesda isn't known as being THE company for gay shit, Elder Scrolls Online had quite a few LGBT characters and FO4 had the all bi romance system with a background gay NPC couple. With that in mind, they might be aiming to step it up with LGBT content. Not that Starfield will definitely have gay/bi romance, just that it's a possibility considering FO4's romance system and Skyrim's marriage system. The chance is low but it'd be hilarious if Bethesda's new sci-fi RPG is gayer than ME:A, considering how progressive Bioware likes to market themselves as.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2017 2:28:59 GMT
Hahaha Yeah. That's how I feel in general with games right now, "guess I won't play anymore" lol. I hope E3 has some game I can look forward to. Cuz literally every game franchise I like is on hold indefinitely. There's a good chance that Bethesda will reveal the new Starfield IP. While Bethesda isn't known as being THE company for gay shit, Elder Scrolls Online had quite a few LGBT characters and FO4 had the all bi romance system with a background gay NPC couple. With that in mind, they might be aiming to step it up with LGBT content. Not that Starfield will definitely have gay/bi romance, just that it's a possibility considering FO4's romance system and Skyrim's marriage system. The chance is low but it'd be hilarious if Bethesda's new sci-fi RPG is gayer than ME:A, considering how progressive Bioware likes to market themselves as. I am hoping it is the case. It is such a step back if they don't include at least some gay/bisexual romance options and it would be pretty frowned upon by progressive gamers. In the case of ME:A I don't know who to blame for what happened? EA or the studio... either way I think the people in charge of overseeing its development should have lost their jobs tbf. Not because of the romance situation alone... but because the game did not come together in the end.
|
|
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 16, 2017 2:30:32 GMT
There's a good chance that Bethesda will reveal the new Starfield IP. While Bethesda isn't known as being THE company for gay shit, Elder Scrolls Online had quite a few LGBT characters and FO4 had the all bi romance system with a background gay NPC couple. With that in mind, they might be aiming to step it up with LGBT content. Not that Starfield will definitely have gay/bi romance, just that it's a possibility considering FO4's romance system and Skyrim's marriage system. The chance is low but it'd be hilarious if Bethesda's new sci-fi RPG is gayer than ME:A, considering how progressive Bioware likes to market themselves as. I am kind of hoping it is the case. It is such a step back if they don't include at least some gay/bisexual romance options and it would be pretty frowned upon by progressive gamers. In the case of ME:A I don't know who to blame for what happened? EA or the studio... either way I think the people in charge of overseeing its development should have lost their jobs tbf. Not because of the romance situation alone... but because the game did not come together in the end. I meant more that Starfield might not have a romance system in general. But I think Bethesda is aware by now that it's a popular mechanic.
|
|
|
Post by Scottphoto on May 16, 2017 2:31:11 GMT
Hahaha Yeah. That's how I feel in general with games right now, "guess I won't play anymore" lol. I hope E3 has some game I can look forward to. Cuz literally every game franchise I like is on hold indefinitely. There's a good chance that Bethesda will reveal the new Starfield IP. While Bethesda isn't known as being THE company for gay shit, Elder Scrolls Online had quite a few LGBT characters and FO4 had the all bi romance system with a background gay NPC couple. With that in mind, they might be aiming to step it up with LGBT content. Not that Starfield will definitely have gay/bi romance, just that it's a possibility considering FO4's romance system and Skyrim's marriage system. The chance is low but it'd be hilarious if Bethesda's new sci-fi RPG is gayer than ME:A, considering how progressive Bioware likes to market themselves as. I'm quite curious about that one, cuz I always wanted to play one of their games but their themes didn't seem to my appeal but anything Space I'm there. And it would be interesting that maybe they purposely go deeper with romances than their previous ones lol.
|
|
|
Post by gaycaravaggio on May 16, 2017 2:34:49 GMT
There's a good chance that Bethesda will reveal the new Starfield IP. While Bethesda isn't known as being THE company for gay shit, Elder Scrolls Online had quite a few LGBT characters and FO4 had the all bi romance system with a background gay NPC couple. With that in mind, they might be aiming to step it up with LGBT content. Not that Starfield will definitely have gay/bi romance, just that it's a possibility considering FO4's romance system and Skyrim's marriage system. The chance is low but it'd be hilarious if Bethesda's new sci-fi RPG is gayer than ME:A, considering how progressive Bioware likes to market themselves as. I'm quite curious about that one, cuz I always wanted to play one of their games but their themes didn't seem to my appeal but anything Space I'm there. And it would be interesting that maybe they purposely go deeper with romances than their previous ones lol. Maybe if Starfield is them trying to cash in on the Mass Effect crowd (with ME being the most famous space RPG franchise), then they'll have a romance system, since ME is known for its romances. Hell, when Saints Row 4 parodied ME, they basically parodied its romance system, so it's known partially for the romance stuff. Then again, I could also see them deciding to not include romances as like, a tone thing. "It doesn't fit the vision we wanted to convey" or something along those lines. Which I wouldn't mind if they had a lot of LGBT characters.
|
|
|
Post by phantomrachie on May 16, 2017 9:43:20 GMT
I'm hoping for some story DLC to close off some story threads and give me more time to chill with the tempest crew. Even DA2 got DLC support, even if its expansion was cancelled. Don't get me wrong DA2 is my favourite Dragon Age game but the backlash after it was horrific (and IMO unjustified) so if BioWare still gave some story DLC to DA2, my hope is they won't leave MEA hanging.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2017 10:13:07 GMT
Hahaha Yeah. That's how I feel in general with games right now, "guess I won't play anymore" lol. I hope E3 has some game I can look forward to. Cuz literally every game franchise I like is on hold indefinitely. There's a good chance that Bethesda will reveal the new Starfield IP. While Bethesda isn't known as being THE company for gay shit, Elder Scrolls Online had quite a few LGBT characters and FO4 had the all bi romance system with a background gay NPC couple. With that in mind, they might be aiming to step it up with LGBT content. Not that Starfield will definitely have gay/bi romance, just that it's a possibility considering FO4's romance system and Skyrim's marriage system. The chance is low but it'd be hilarious if Bethesda's new sci-fi RPG is gayer than ME:A, considering how progressive Bioware likes to market themselves as. Well it certainly would be nice if there were some other AAA gaming company for the LGBT folks to turn to.
|
|
|
Post by VFerreira93 on May 16, 2017 10:52:20 GMT
Maybe a DLC hint? Not sure, but it's something. On a related note, I'll be peeved if, even in DLC, Cora gets more content than anyone else. IMO, the characters with the most content should have less DLC content than the other characters because they already got so much in the main game. I definitely with your statement. I'd give the opportunity for others to shine since they ended not having a lot of attention in the main game. To think that Bioware said that even the most tiny of secondary characters would have a lot of content... Honestly, after everything that has happened bever since Andromeda launched, it doesnt surprise me in the least that no Mass Effect game has a GOTY award (in comparison to DAI)
|
|
Lionrage
The Beastmaster
Ginger Cloud Gayzer
Posts: 324
Likes: 1,451
|
Post by Lionrage on May 16, 2017 10:53:21 GMT
I'm hoping for some story DLC to close off some story threads and give me more time to chill with the tempest crew. Even DA2 got DLC support, even if its expansion was cancelled. Don't get me wrong DA2 is my favourite Dragon Age game but the backlash after it was horrific (and IMO unjustified) so if BioWare still gave some story DLC to DA2, my hope is they won't leave MEA hanging. Having more content with the crew would be awesome. It's one of the things that would get me back into MEA. Adding more well thought out roles, content and even (a) mission(s) for the squad mates as well as characters such as Kallo, Suvi, Gil and Lexi, could be woven into the open story lines the writers already set up in the original game. Some ideas for those characters: Gil: Once they find the Quarian ark, Gil's talent of improvising with advanced tech is instrumental in saving the ark itself. In addition you need his help in safely opening certain pods of the Ark's crew as the SAM responsible is either critically damaged or has been disposed off by Reaper/Geth infiltrators abroad the Ark. Based on his advice you get to send the other recruited Pathfinders across the Ark to intervene, maybe even have one of the Pathfinders as a temporary squad mate once you reach them to help them out even further. How you perform during the mission will determine the remaining start population of each species aboard the ark (and to what degree the species appears in the games hubs & surroundings) while having larger consequences in future games when it comes to (political) power balances between the species in Heleus and Andromeda. Lexi: Anti-Krogan extremists create a virus based on the research of genetic augmentation performed on the Krogan during their travel to Andromeda and intents to eradicate the Krogan colony on Elaadan with it. This particular plot line would involve Lexi's expertise as she has extensive knowledge on Krogan physiology, fertility and exo-genetic research. They could also combine some added content for other characters by involving Drack a bit and even Reyes if part of the story would take it to a new part of Kadara (maybe a restored waterfront now that the planet is restored by a Remnant Vault?). In the end the mission takes you to an installation on Elaadan itself, at the bottom of a large sinkhole near New Tuchunka. Aside from stopping the virus from being released, you also discover an new location to either extend the Krogan colony or provide a place for Drell colonists to settle. You have to make that choice, the larger consequences of which will be felt in later games. In MEA, choosing the Drell to colonize the spot would lead to the AI outpost having more Drell than Krogan and the main spaceport being expanded with some quest givers added to the main colony. If you choose to give it to the Krogan, the main spaceport is also expanded with some quest givers but there is tension in the AI outpost as other races start to feel uneasy about the Krogan's fast progress in relation to their own. Kallo: Part of the original design and construction team Kallo worked with actually make it to Andromeda on the Salarian as well as the Quarian Ark. After the initial happy reunion, not all is well it seems. It turns out that they actually ascribe to a 'Salarian first, aliens second' philosophy similar to Cerberus. Before the Quarian Ark left they managed to stow away several new warships based on the Tempest class design with the official intent of protecting the Ark. After the Ark gets in trouble, they manage to escape, leaving the Ark to fend for itself. The ships may be relatively small in comparison to the warships back in the Milky Way but with the Nexus itself seriously under powered and the AI's general lack of military vessels, they lack the capability to stop them outright. Kallo evidently wants to stop them and you need his piloting skills more then ever to outsmart and outrun the updated vessels. In the end, you have to choose to either destroy or use the vessels for the Andromeda Initiative. This could upstage the power balance both within the AI as well as in Heleus in general. Suvi: After the arrival of the Quarian ark, the Drell, Hanar and Elcor aboard will want to settle on a place suitable for them as well. As Eos seems to be an ideal candidate she suggests to work on a rapid expansion of the colony. In order to do so they need greater access to resources on the planet itself. Beneath the surface they discover that aside from Remnant tech, aquifers and underground rivers...Eos also contains a vast cavern system filled with fresh water with some of the planets original flora and fauna from before Remnant started to tamper with the planet. This mission could involve both Suvi as well as some of the scientists on the Nexus. Finally, maybe involve one or two of the recruited Pathfinders as well. Eventually you find that the original ecology is quite dangerous, but also could benefit Quarian and Turians immensely as it's dextro amino based. There are consequences however, extracting more fresh water will damage the remaining ecology significantly to the point of extinction but does allow for expansion of the existing colony and the Drell to settle. Choosing to save the remaining ecology leads to Quarians and Turians getting more say on Eos and are able to settle it in full. But the overall presence on Eos remains more limited because of lower resources. In MEA this leads to the original settlements of 'Promise' & 'Resilience' being turned into a large second settlement when choosing the first option. While if you choose the second only 'Resilience' is being reclaimed with a primarily Turian/Quarian population.
|
|
|
Post by phantomrachie on May 16, 2017 11:09:03 GMT
On a related note, I'll be peeved if, even in DLC, Cora gets more content than anyone else. IMO, the characters with the most content should have less DLC content than the other characters because they already got so much in the main game. I definitely with your statement. I'd give the opportunity for others to shine since they ended not having a lot of attention in the main game. To think that Bioware said that even the most tiny of secondary characters would have a lot of content... Honestly, after everything that has happened bever since Andromeda launched, it doesnt surprise me in the least that no Mass Effect game has a GOTY award (in comparison to DAI) I genuinely think that there was a misunderstanding of what BioWare said about this by journalists that lead to fan disappointment. What BioWare said was that the character with the least amount of dialogue in MEA has more than the character with the most amount in ME3. There is a lot of dialogue in MEA, characters on the Tempest are constantly chatting to each other and there is a huge amount of banter in the Nomad. They interact with each other in this way more than any other Mass Effect game. However what some fans expected when told there was more content with characters, were more fleshed out scenes with Ryder, not the characters chatting to each other, which led to disappointment. Personally, I'd prefer a combination of what we got in MEA with the DA:I approach which would give us all the nice chatting between characters with more fleshed out scenes, but BioWare only promised more dialogue, which is what we got.
|
|
|
Post by VFerreira93 on May 16, 2017 11:15:48 GMT
I definitely with your statement. I'd give the opportunity for others to shine since they ended not having a lot of attention in the main game. To think that Bioware said that even the most tiny of secondary characters would have a lot of content... Honestly, after everything that has happened bever since Andromeda launched, it doesnt surprise me in the least that no Mass Effect game has a GOTY award (in comparison to DAI) I genuinely think that there was a misunderstanding of what BioWare said about this by journalists that lead to fan disappointment. What BioWare said was that the character with the least amount of dialogue in MEA has more than the character with the most amount in ME3. There is a lot of dialogue in MEA, characters on the Tempest are constantly chatting to each other and there is a huge amount of banter in the Nomad. They interact with each other in this way more than any other Mass Effect game. However what some fans expected when told there was more content with characters, were more fleshed out scenes with Ryder, not the characters chatting to each other, which led to disappointment. Personally, I'd prefer a combination of what we got in MEA with the DA:I approach which would give us all the nice chatting between characters with more fleshed out scenes, but BioWare only promised more dialogue, which is what we got. I didnt remember the exact words, so thanks for pointing it out. But still, it doesnt make it less true. Bioware also said the crew would have way more content (equal to the "Advisors on DAI" level), and look how that turned out to be
|
|