|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2017 11:00:49 GMT
That's not some objective truth, you know. I don't get the Cullen/Samson shippers, either. Then again, there are also Anders/Fenris shippers, and that even has a name: Fenders. Someone even asked David Gaider about it lol! I guess people just like the idea of hate fucking? I don't know how much of this is an actual ship, but there is also Alistair/Morrigan, which I also think is dumb. Both loathe each other, and Alistair even refers to Morrigan as a bitch in one dialogue. I don't get any of these. You're right, it's not objectively true. I do know, however, that Iron Bull and Dorian are more "together" after trespasser than either of them are with the Inky, so ... They're not. Both romance slides have them meeting occasionally. The Inquisitor can actually go into Tevinter, while Dorian has to travel down to the border to meet with Bull. [edit] Having just read all of the epilogues, I do think it appears worse for the Bull-mancers, though, since it doesn't say anything about meeting up for theirs.
|
|
Catilina
The Beastmaster
Wanted Apostate
Posts: 827
Likes: 3,282
|
Post by Catilina on May 29, 2017 11:02:27 GMT
phantomrachie I think Anders and Solas are similar for the reasons people like them. Yes, there is the tragic element of it all, which appeals to some people. But there are also those who don't do the romance (or at least don't have it as their canon, even if they have played it), and who may not like Anders as a person, but who think he is a compelling character. I am one of those. Anders has a very large goal. Far beyond the immediate needs of the mages in Kirkwall, it extends to all mages under Chantry rule. He doesn't matter. The individual mages in Kirkwall don't matter. If you are a fem Hawke in a romance with him, he talks about the future possibility of having children and not having to worry that they will be taken away. His vision is toward the horizon, in envisioning a better place for all mages, and all future mages that aren't even born. As much as I disagree with his methods, I do think it was the only way. The Chantry had to be forced, and violence was the only way. I think it was one of the most real things Dragon Age has ever done. Both Anders and Justice were my Warden's friends. She would be very sad to learn what happened to them both. Neither of them exist anymore, not really as the same person they were. Anders and Solas aren't similar. Solas wants to restore the past, Anders wants to build a new future. Many people who can accept Solas, reject Anders as unacceptable. I can understand them: Solas a calm, philosophical, smart, silent, mystical, cool 1000 years old vampire elf demigod, Anders an angry, nervous, moody, impatient, jealous, judgmental, mannerless, human "sewer rat". Solas is "deep", Anders just "selfish". Solas's not a monster (he said, himself!), Anders's a monster (he said, himself!) So: Anders doesn't have a chance against Solas...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2017 11:12:29 GMT
Ander and Solas aren't similar. Solas wants to restore the past, Anders wants to build a new future. Many people who can accept Solas, reject Anders as unacceptable. I can understand them: Solas a calm, philosophical, smart, silent, mystical, cool 1000 years old vampire elf demigod, Anders an angry, nervous, moody, impatient, jealous, judgmental, mannerless, human "sewer rat". Solas is "deep", Anders just "selfish". Solas's not a monster (he said, himself!), Anders's a monster (he said, himself!) So: Anders doesn't have a chance against Solas... I guess I should have elaborated there. I was referring to them both being complex characters with varying motivations that aren't swayed by their personal feelings. They both have large goals that can hurt people in the short term. And both characters have people that like them and think they're interesting outside of being in a romance with them, even if they don't like them as people.
|
|
|
Post by jjdxb on May 29, 2017 11:19:49 GMT
You're right, it's not objectively true. I do know, however, that Iron Bull and Dorian are more "together" after trespasser than either of them are with the Inky, so ... They're not. Both romance slides have them meeting occasionally. The Inquisitor can actually go into Tevinter, while Dorian has to travel down to the border to meet with Bull. [edit] Having just read all of the epilogues, I do think it appears worse for the Bull-mancers, though, since it doesn't say anything about meeting up for theirs. I concede your point re Dorian, but as you say, Bull seems to prefer Dorian.
|
|
|
Post by toomanyclouds on May 29, 2017 11:24:57 GMT
Cullen. I didn't really find his character arc in DA:I very compelling Solas. I think everyone has said their piece on him Loghain, Gaspard, for reasons already said. Oh, and Samson. Like, why are there so many Samson/Cullen shippers on AO3? What about this pairing and Samson at all makes any compelling sense? Dorian and Bull, but more so the fans of their romance. Their romance with each other is clearly better, enough that it ruins any player romance with them.Anders, Fenris for being insufferable Merrill. I like her, but I don't get why so many people really like her. That's not some objective truth, you know. I don't get the Cullen/Samson shippers, either. Then again, there are also Anders/Fenris shippers, and that even has a name: Fenders. Someone even asked David Gaider about it lol! I guess people just like the idea of hate fucking? I don't know how much of this is an actual ship, but there is also Alistair/Morrigan, which I also think is dumb. Both loathe each other, and Alistair even refers to Morrigan as a bitch in one dialogue. I don't get any of these. I don't ship any of these, either, but it's just basically the rivalmance concept applied to NPCs. Or the old "if he pulls your hair he likes you." Sometimes the idea that two characters are fundamentally at odds with each other in some way results in them having a compelling relationship that is more interesting to talk/write about than one that is basically smooth sailing. I guess it's usually about scenarios in which they might be forced to realise they have more similarities than they were formerly aware of (i.e., both Anders and Fenris are intrinsically motivated by a struggle for freedom). Best case, they could then even start to make each other better by trying to understand the other person's point of view, being motivated by their initial attraction to do so. Personally, I don't really thinks this works here because in the case of Fenders, they just dislike each other too much to have a realistic starting point and Anders' whole character arc in the game is about growing more extreme and less compromising. Morrigan and Alistair... just plain don't seem to like each other as people, there's not even a great central ideological conflict there that could make for some interesting fodder, I just got the feeling that before all of their differences in opinion, they don't gel on a personal level. But hey, I'm sure some fic writers can make it work.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2017 11:25:55 GMT
They're not. Both romance slides have them meeting occasionally. The Inquisitor can actually go into Tevinter, while Dorian has to travel down to the border to meet with Bull. [edit] Having just read all of the epilogues, I do think it appears worse for the Bull-mancers, though, since it doesn't say anything about meeting up for theirs. I concede your point re Dorian, but as you say, Bull seems to prefer Dorian. I try not to look at it that way. But it doesn't stop me from being irritated with Patrick Weekes and David Gaider on behalf of all of us who romanced those guys.
|
|
|
Post by jjdxb on May 29, 2017 11:28:10 GMT
I concede your point re Dorian, but as you say, Bull seems to prefer Dorian. I try not to look at it that way. But it doesn't stop me from being irritated with Patrick Weekes and David Gaider on behalf of all of us who romanced those guys. It's hard for me if I feel they are better with each other (it's subjective, I know). It kinda feels... selfish? I really wish they didn't go down that route, but there was a lot of fan pressure to make them a working couple by Trespasser. It doesn't help that they aren't really my type either (neither is Cullen tbf).
|
|
Catilina
The Beastmaster
Wanted Apostate
Posts: 827
Likes: 3,282
|
Post by Catilina on May 29, 2017 11:32:19 GMT
Here is a big one that I might get yelled at for but... Anders. I don't get why people like him in DA:O Awakening where he is a sarcastic asshole and in DA2 he is a tortured asshole. Although I do know that some people find the whole tortured thing sexy, he is still an asshole. And I'm not even talking about him blowing up the Chantry without telling Hawke because I understand why he didn't tell her about it but the fact that he clearly did not give one shite about what would happen to the Mages after he did it. The entire Circle of Rivain, most of the Circle of Kirkwall and 100's of others were murdered because of what he did and he knew that was going to happen because the Templars as an order use violence to solve nearly all of their problems and he didn't even give the Mages a heads up, or put anything in place to help the Mages once Elthina was dead. He knows all about the abuses that happen in the Chantry, he has suffered through those abuses and yet he is willing to sacrifice the lives of innocent Mages for his revenge. He is no better than a Templar. Also just started another run of DA:I so I'm going to harp on Cullen again for a moment. Got to the bit where he is excusing the Templars leaving the Chantry because the Chantry has taken them for granted and I just wanted to slap him in the face. Divine Justina starts seriously looking into the grievances of the Mages instead of ignoring them as per usual and the Templars close ranks & throw a hissy fit. If anything the events post DA2 & Pre DA:I just confirms the serious lack of oversight the Chantry had over the Templars and Seekers. The Chantry were clearly never really in control of them so this rebellion because of a slight was inevitable. What about someone, who likes this "asshole", because of he have many virtues AND flaws too. He have reason to not tell, what he planned. For example: 1. Hawke can jeopardize his plan (confirmed: Hawke can betray him, no matter, than Elthina and Cullen too idiot...), 2. he last trusted his parents as a child. His father betrayed him. Later, he trusted Karl. Karl died. He trusted in the Wardens, they betrayed him to the Templars. 3. he doesn't want to involve Hawke more than he considers necessary; And he tell Hawke, what he plans is bloody, if Hawke interest about it: It's "easy to support freedom, until no one to died to achieve it". I think, from that sentence, Hawke would be able to conclude, that his plan's not so peaceful (I also was disappointed, that he was secretive and later vague, but I still can understand his decision.) I don't really like tragic romances, and Anders' romance one of the most satisfying romance for me in the series with the results, and never tragic (I didn't kill him, or rivaled him). Because I agree with him about his purpose, and even see, that to blow up the Chantry, was a good strategic. He released the ghost from the bottle, but doesn't responsible for the Templars sins.
|
|
|
Post by toomanyclouds on May 29, 2017 11:38:13 GMT
They're not. Both romance slides have them meeting occasionally. The Inquisitor can actually go into Tevinter, while Dorian has to travel down to the border to meet with Bull. [edit] Having just read all of the epilogues, I do think it appears worse for the Bull-mancers, though, since it doesn't say anything about meeting up for theirs. I concede your point re Dorian, but as you say, Bull seems to prefer Dorian. I also have this problem more in the case of the Bull romance than the Dorian romance in general. Bull's romance is focused very much on the sexual aspect and generally rather sexy and funny than romantic (which is fine, I'm not very romantic myself, I didn't mind that). It also begins quite abruptly after you've been flirting like five time without really getting any great reaction. I think one could head-canon that the Bull is just closed-off because the Inquisitor is the Inquisitor and you don't really talk about tying your boss up in public. When Cole and Varric poke about it in conversation, he's pretty fast to say it's a private matter. However, this is not made clear enough to an extent that it doesn't feel a bit weird when IB talks freely about his and Dorian's relationship with Varric, or in front of everyone else without Cole prompting. That coupled with knowing how interesting Gaider, Dorian's writer, obviously thought this couple was just makes me think of them as the "canon" romance and makes IB's romance less appealing to me because it feels honestly like I'm going a bit against author intent and IB'd be happier if he wasn't "forced" into romancing my Player Character. (Dorian at least seems mostly in love enough with the Inquisitor to make me forget it.)
|
|
|
Post by pessimistpanda on May 29, 2017 11:42:07 GMT
Well, who cares what David Gaider thinks?
|
|
Catilina
The Beastmaster
Wanted Apostate
Posts: 827
Likes: 3,282
|
Post by Catilina on May 29, 2017 11:50:35 GMT
Ander and Solas aren't similar. Solas wants to restore the past, Anders wants to build a new future. Many people who can accept Solas, reject Anders as unacceptable. I can understand them: Solas a calm, philosophical, smart, silent, mystical, cool 1000 years old vampire elf demigod, Anders an angry, nervous, moody, impatient, jealous, judgmental, mannerless, human "sewer rat". Solas is "deep", Anders just "selfish". Solas's not a monster (he said, himself!), Anders's a monster (he said, himself!) So: Anders doesn't have a chance against Solas... I guess I should have elaborated there. I was referring to them both being complex characters with varying motivations that aren't swayed by their personal feelings. They both have large goals that can hurt people in the short term. And both characters have people that like them and think they're interesting outside of being in a romance with them, even if they don't like them as people. I just never will understand really: why some people can accept Solas, while totally reject Anders. As I thought about, I was wrong, and you're right: The young Solas was similar than Anders, the new Solas is different. New Solas, if insists his plan will harm people in the long run. As he assumes: every people in Thedas will die except "his" people, who doesn't exist anymore... Anders never planned such a thing. This two sentence also similar: "I didn't lead a rebellion against the immortal mage-kings without getting my hands bloody" It's "easy to support freedom, until no one to died to achieve it".
The difference: people can accept that from Solas' mouth, but not from Anders' mouth.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2017 12:02:27 GMT
Well, who cares what David Gaider thinks? Believe me, I wish I had your thought process about it. Negative thoughts tend to hang around in my brain, so I can't really escape it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2017 12:08:12 GMT
I guess I should have elaborated there. I was referring to them both being complex characters with varying motivations that aren't swayed by their personal feelings. They both have large goals that can hurt people in the short term. And both characters have people that like them and think they're interesting outside of being in a romance with them, even if they don't like them as people. I just never will understand really: why some people can accept Solas, while totally reject Anders. As I thought about, I was wrong, and you're right: The young Solas was similar than Anders, the new Solas is different. New Solas, if insists his plan will harm people in the long run. As he assumes: every people in Thedas will die except "his" people, who doesn't exist anymore... Anders never planned such a thing. This two sentence also similar: "I didn't lead a rebellion against the immortal mage-kings without getting my hands bloody" It's "easy to support freedom, until no one to died to achieve it".
The difference: people can accept that from Solas' mouth, but not from Anders' mouth. Okay, let me put it another way. I was merely suggesting that people like similar components of the characters. Here is another example. One of the reasons I like the Fenris, Dorian, and Gil romances is that they are all just a little bit broken. None of these men are similar to each other, and neither are their romances. But they have that in common that makes the relationships compelling for me. I can't explain it any other way.
|
|
|
Post by phantomrachie on May 29, 2017 12:23:07 GMT
Here is a big one that I might get yelled at for but... Anders. I don't get why people like him in DA:O Awakening where he is a sarcastic asshole and in DA2 he is a tortured asshole. Although I do know that some people find the whole tortured thing sexy, he is still an asshole. And I'm not even talking about him blowing up the Chantry without telling Hawke because I understand why he didn't tell her about it but the fact that he clearly did not give one shite about what would happen to the Mages after he did it. The entire Circle of Rivain, most of the Circle of Kirkwall and 100's of others were murdered because of what he did and he knew that was going to happen because the Templars as an order use violence to solve nearly all of their problems and he didn't even give the Mages a heads up, or put anything in place to help the Mages once Elthina was dead. He knows all about the abuses that happen in the Chantry, he has suffered through those abuses and yet he is willing to sacrifice the lives of innocent Mages for his revenge. He is no better than a Templar. Also just started another run of DA:I so I'm going to harp on Cullen again for a moment. Got to the bit where he is excusing the Templars leaving the Chantry because the Chantry has taken them for granted and I just wanted to slap him in the face. Divine Justina starts seriously looking into the grievances of the Mages instead of ignoring them as per usual and the Templars close ranks & throw a hissy fit. If anything the events post DA2 & Pre DA:I just confirms the serious lack of oversight the Chantry had over the Templars and Seekers. The Chantry were clearly never really in control of them so this rebellion because of a slight was inevitable. What about someone, who likes this "asshole", because of he have many virtues AND flaws too. He have reason to not tell, what he planned. For example: 1. Hawke can jeopardize his plan (confirmed: Hawke can betray him, no matter, than Elthina and Cullen too idiot...), 2. he last trusted his parents as a child. His father betrayed him. Later, he trusted Karl. Karl died. He trusted in the Wardens, they betrayed him to the Templars. 3. he doesn't want to involve Hawke more than he considers necessary; And he tell Hawke, what he plans is bloody, if Hawke interest about it: It's "easy to support freedom, until no one to died to achieve it". I think, from that sentence, Hawke would be able to conclude, that his plan's not so peaceful (I also was disappointed, that he was secretive and later vague, but I still can understand his decision.) like I said in my post, I 100% understand why he didn't tell Hawke. My issue is that whole he talks alot about freedom mages, his actions or lack thereof indicate that he doesn't actually care about the consequences his actions have for other people. He is willing to be killed for his actions but he doesn't seem care that about anyone else who might die as a consequence of something he did, so it makes it come off like he did what he did for revenge rather than for the good of mages.
|
|
|
Post by yourfunnyuncle on May 29, 2017 12:25:09 GMT
I don't know how much of this is an actual ship, but there is also Alistair/Morrigan, which I also think is dumb. Both loathe each other, and Alistair even refers to Morrigan as a bitch in one dialogue. I completely agree that it's a ridiculous idea for a ship. I do like the little interaction you can get in DAI if Alistair did the dark ritual with her and remained a warden. After all those years there's almost respect there, especially from Morrigan's side, but an actual relationship? Er... Nope. Never happening.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 29, 2017 12:28:28 GMT
I don't know how much of this is an actual ship, but there is also Alistair/Morrigan, which I also think is dumb. Both loathe each other, and Alistair even refers to Morrigan as a bitch in one dialogue. I completely agree that it's a ridiculous idea for a ship. I do like the little interaction you can get in DAI if Alistair did the dark ritual with her and remained a warden. After all those years there's almost respect there, especially from Morrigan's side, but an actual relationship? Er... Nope. Never happening. I had never seen that. Thanks! Kind of, er, rude to talk about Kieran like that when he's 10 feet away.
|
|
|
Post by phantomrachie on May 29, 2017 12:38:42 GMT
I don't know how much of this is an actual ship, but there is also Alistair/Morrigan, which I also think is dumb. Both loathe each other, and Alistair even refers to Morrigan as a bitch in one dialogue. I completely agree that it's a ridiculous idea for a ship. I do like the little interaction you can get in DAI if Alistair did the dark ritual with her and remained a warden. After all those years there's almost respect there, especially from Morrigan's side, but an actual relationship? Er... Nope. Never happening. OMG does Kieran just stand there and listen to his parents talk about the night the had sex?
|
|
Catilina
The Beastmaster
Wanted Apostate
Posts: 827
Likes: 3,282
|
Post by Catilina on May 29, 2017 12:40:05 GMT
What about someone, who likes this "asshole", because of he have many virtues AND flaws too. He have reason to not tell, what he planned. For example: 1. Hawke can jeopardize his plan (confirmed: Hawke can betray him, no matter, than Elthina and Cullen too idiot...), 2. he last trusted his parents as a child. His father betrayed him. Later, he trusted Karl. Karl died. He trusted in the Wardens, they betrayed him to the Templars. 3. he doesn't want to involve Hawke more than he considers necessary; And he tell Hawke, what he plans is bloody, if Hawke interest about it: It's "easy to support freedom, until no one to died to achieve it". I think, from that sentence, Hawke would be able to conclude, that his plan's not so peaceful (I also was disappointed, that he was secretive and later vague, but I still can understand his decision.) like I said in my post, I 100% understand why he didn't tell Hawke. My issue is that whole he talks alot about freedom mages, his actions or lack thereof indicate that he doesn't actually care about the consequences his actions have for other people. He is willing to be killed for his actions but he doesn't seem care that about anyone else who might die as a consequence of something he did, so it makes it come off like he did what he did for revenge rather than for the good of mages. This was not a mage-savior act, and he never told that. This was the cause of the revolution, of the necessary war. This was a cruel action, but not revenge. (What Sebastian did in Inquisition, was personal revenge, just compare the two.) I didn't see satisfaction on him. He was not happy because of people died. He (and Justice) accepts Hawke's verdict, because this is RIGHT, the murder happened, and he's a murderer in fact, he know that.
|
|
|
Post by yourfunnyuncle on May 29, 2017 13:20:10 GMT
I had never seen that. Thanks! Kind of, er, rude to talk about Kieran like that when he's 10 feet away. OMG does Kieran just stand there and listen to his parents talk about the night the had sex? Yeah it's quite odd that they talk about him as if he weren't there! To get that scene you need a world state where Alistair did the dark ritual and remained a warden, then you need to do Wicked Eyes and Wicked Hearts before Here Lies the Abyss, so that Morrigan and Alistair are both at Skyhold. I can't lay claim to finding that it existed, but once I knew about it, I had to see it!
|
|
|
Post by pessimistpanda on May 29, 2017 13:37:23 GMT
Is "bitch" that serious of an insult? I have real trouble believing that Alistair and Morrigan "hate" each other. Their dialogue in DA:O doesn't suggest that to me at all.
"You're stupid!"
"Well... you have a big nose!"
Like, come on. At worst, Morrigan and Alistair are bickering siblings on a road trip.
|
|